The chance that we are heading into WW3 is probably 75%+. The chance it will go nuclear is even higher. It will start unless the USA and NATO back away from sending troops into Syria.
War is imminent. The claim about Assad using chemical weapons is from the same Pentagon psycho's who tried to sell us the "Yellowcake Uranium" story, and Colin Powell's cartoon-like "Mobile Chemical Weapons Factories". These transparent lies, designed to demonize the next country in America's crosshairs, are a sure sign that another illegal war of aggression is commencing. But this war will be very different. It will become clear within days that America and Israel are not "winning" anything. Israel will be flattened. American aircraft carriers will sink. Every American base in the middle east will be a target for multiple munitions.
China and Russia have a mutual aide agreement in the S.C.O. Charter, and they do a lot of military exercises together. Russia has a naval facility in Syria, located at Tartus. Attacking Syria is the same as attacking Russia. Putin will not look the other way.
The US/NATO attack on Syria is a certainty at this point. Iran and Hezbollah have promised to defend Syria, and they will unleash more precision guided missiles on Israeli and US targets than anyone can imagine. China has made it clear to the USA and NATO that Iran is off limits. China depends on Iranian oil, and China will go to war before they allow America to steal Iran's oilfields.
Things will escalate very quickly once the cruise missiles start striking Syria. China and Russia will definitely back Syria and Iran. Once we have China, Russia, Iran and Syria fighting the USA, NATO and Israel that's WW3 right there.
Now here is the freaky part. There are a whole lot of Neo-Con's in the Pentagon who believe the USA and NATO can defeat Russia, China and their allies. They want WW3, and they believe they can "win" a full scale Defcon 1 nuclear war.
The reason they want this war, and the sooner the better, is this: The Pentagon and NATO represent bankrupt America and the bankrupt Euro nations. They know their economies are crumbling, at the same time that the BRIC economies are about to skyrocket. America will never again be the Economic Champion of the world. Those days are rapidly fading into a distant memory. Russia and China are both cooperating on unprecedented military modernization, expansion and exchanges of military technology. Roughly around 2020 these nations will be economically AND militarily superior to the NATO countries. This reality does not sit well with the Neo-Con decision makers in Washington and Brussels.
1 comment:
A new book on 9/11 is out, written by someone who knew the Mossad agent who organised the events of that day.
Dimitri Khalezov has spent 10 years researching and writing this book. Download links:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0pdmokX9s8
Or read at:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/170266922/9-11thology-The-third-truth-about-9-11-or-Defending-the-US-Government-which-has-only-the-first-two
In a 2010 interview, Khalezov explained that you can't build a skyscraper in NYC without an approved demolition plan. On 9/11, the World Trade Center's demolition plan was put into action to demolish the complex.
Khalezov learned of this demolition plan from his job in the Soviet Union. He had worked in the nuclear intelligence unit and under an agreement between the Soviet Union and the USA, each country was obliged to inform the other of peaceful uses of nuclear explosions. The WTC was built with 3 thermo-nuclear charges in its foundations.
Note: underground nuclear explosions do not produce mushroom clouds. This is only ever seen when the explosion takes place above ground. On 9/11, the explosions were deep underground.
More info:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_154.htm
You can watch the 2010 interview at:
http://www.disclose.tv/forum/dimitri-khalezov-wtc-nuclear-demolition-full-playlist-t21675.html
Video # 4 - WTC's demolition plan
Video # 14 - WTC 7 (which fell ½ hour AFTER the BBC announced its collapse).
Videos # 24/25 - chronic radiation sickness of WTC responders (their cancers are not due to asbestos poisoning)
Khalezov was interviewed on 4 Sept 2013:
http://www.renseradioarchives.com/harris/
I know it is preposterous to claim that the WTC was brought down by nukes. But if you look up the meaning of 'Ground Zero' in the old dictionaries you have at home, you'll find that there would only be one definition. It is what you call a place that has been nuked.
After 9/11, the US government sent people round to every bookshop and public library on the planet to replace ALL the dictionaries. The replacements differed only in the meaning of 'ground zero'. They show extra definitions for that term, to obfuscate the original single meaning.
For example, if you have a genuine old Merriam-Webster dictionary, you would see this:
ground zero n (1946) : the point directly above, below, or at which a nuclear explosion occurs.
The replacement books (even of old editions) show two extra definitions and this is what you'll see:
ground zero n (1946) 1 : the point directly above, below, or at which a nuclear explosion occurs. 2: the center or origin of rapid, intense, or violent activity or change 3: the very beginning : SQUARE ONE
Have a look at this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBQuoPi_grw
At 6:05 mins, he shows the old and new definitions of 'Ground Zero'.
Post a Comment